Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-05-07 Senate Journal Page 4489 HJR 55 CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 55(RES) Relating to the importance to the economy of Southeast Alaska of continued timber harvests on the Tongass National Forest, was read the second time. Senator Miller moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Resources Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 4214. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 55(RES) was adopted. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 55(RES) was read the second time. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 2, lines 27 - 29: Delete all material. 1994-05-07 Senate Journal Page 4490 HJR 55 Page 3, line 15, following "Congress": Insert "to continue" Page 3, line 16: Delete "industry" Insert ", fishing, and tourism industries" Page 3, line 18, following "1990": Insert ", as mandated by sec. 706(b) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980" Page 3, line 20: Delete "increase" Insert "stabilize" Page 3, line 21, following "Forest": Insert "in order to assure a long-term, stable timber industry" Page 3, line 24: Delete "the maximum" Insert "a stable" Page 3, line 25: Delete "possible under current law" Page 3, line 29: Delete "maximum" Insert "continued" Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHJR 55(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 1994-05-07 Senate Journal Page 4491 HJR 55 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Jacko, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 55(RES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall the resolution be advanced to third reading?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHJR 55(RES) Advance from Second to Third Reading? YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kelly, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, the resolution failed to advance to third reading.